基于张衡一号卫星波动观测的人工甚低频台站信号特征统计分析

王亚璐, 项正, 泽仁志玛, 倪彬彬, 刘阳希子, 张学民, 欧阳新艳, 吴迎燕, 申旭辉. 2023. 基于张衡一号卫星波动观测的人工甚低频台站信号特征统计分析. 地球物理学报, 66(11): 4451-4463, doi: 10.6038/cjg2023R0421
引用本文: 王亚璐, 项正, 泽仁志玛, 倪彬彬, 刘阳希子, 张学民, 欧阳新艳, 吴迎燕, 申旭辉. 2023. 基于张衡一号卫星波动观测的人工甚低频台站信号特征统计分析. 地球物理学报, 66(11): 4451-4463, doi: 10.6038/cjg2023R0421
WANG YaLu, XIANG Zheng, Zeren ZhiMa, NI BinBin, LIU YangXiZi, ZHANG XueMin, OUYANG XinYan, WU YingYan, SHEN XuHui. 2023. Statistical study of the distribution properties of very-low-frequency transmitter signals based on CSES wave measurements. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 66(11): 4451-4463, doi: 10.6038/cjg2023R0421
Citation: WANG YaLu, XIANG Zheng, Zeren ZhiMa, NI BinBin, LIU YangXiZi, ZHANG XueMin, OUYANG XinYan, WU YingYan, SHEN XuHui. 2023. Statistical study of the distribution properties of very-low-frequency transmitter signals based on CSES wave measurements. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 66(11): 4451-4463, doi: 10.6038/cjg2023R0421

基于张衡一号卫星波动观测的人工甚低频台站信号特征统计分析

  • 基金项目:

    中国地震局地震预测研究所基本科研业务经费(CEAIEF2022030204)和国家自然科学基金(42025404, 42304093, 42174190)共同资助

详细信息
    作者简介:

    王亚璐, 女, 助理研究员, 主要从事电离层波动及其效应研究.E-mail: wangyalu310@163.com

    通讯作者: 倪彬彬, 男, 教授, 主要从事辐射带物理与空间波粒相互作用研究.E-mail: bbni@whu.edu.cn
  • 中图分类号: P352

Statistical study of the distribution properties of very-low-frequency transmitter signals based on CSES wave measurements

More Information
  • 地基人工甚低频(10~30 kHz)台站信号可以穿透电离层, 甚至泄露进地球磁层, 从而导致内辐射带高能电子的沉降.研究人工甚低频台站信号的特征对于研究辐射带电子的损失具有重要的科学意义.基于张衡一号卫星2019—2022年的电场观测数据, 本文对全球10个人工甚低频台站在电离层中的信号特征进行了研究, 统计分析了电离层中人工甚低频台站信号的昼夜差异、季变规律、对地磁活动水平的依赖性, 及其在地磁共轭区的分布特征.结果表明, 人工甚低频台站信号会传播至台站上空电离层及其共轭区, 信号辐射范围及强度与台站的发射功率呈正相关.电离层电子密度对甚低频信号的传播具有重要影响, 在夜侧和当地冬季, 电离层电子密度相对较小时, 泄露进入内磁层的人工甚低频台站信号较强, 而信号强度受地磁活动影响很弱.在台站上空, 信号增强区域以穿刺点为中心呈现近圆形分布, 并存在明显的波模干涉效应, 在共轭半球, 信号增强区域中心相对共轭穿刺点会发生极向漂移(L<2的台站)或赤道向漂移(L>2的台站), 但所有台站的电波能量都被限制在1/2赤道电子回旋频率磁壳以内的区域.这些统计观测特征表明, 发射台站位于较低L值(L<1.4)的人工甚低频台站信号在内磁层中主要以非导管模式传播到共轭半球, 而发射台站位于较高L值(L>2.6)的人工甚低频台站信号主要以导管模式传播.

  • 加载中
  • 图 1 

    夜侧人工甚低频台站上空总电场功率谱密度平面图及其随时间的变化曲线

    Figure 1. 

    The averaged radiation pattern and time series curve of total electric field power spectral density from the VLF transmitters, as detected by CSES on the night-side

    图 2 

    日侧人工甚低频台站上空总电场功率谱密度平面图及其随时间的变化曲线

    Figure 2. 

    The averaged radiation pattern and time series curve of total electric field power spectral density from the VLF transmitters, as detected by CSES on the dayside

    图 3 

    人工甚低频台站信号总电场功率谱密度随AE指数的变化曲线

    Figure 3. 

    The variation with geomagnetic index AE of the electric field power spectral density of the VLF transmitters

    图 4 

    人工甚低频台站及其共轭区上空总电场功率谱平面图

    Figure 4. 

    The electric field radiation pattern from the VLF transmitters at both the overhead and geomagnetic conjugate region

    图 5 

    NWC甚低频台站上空不同卫星观测的电场功率谱密度随纬度的变化曲线

    Figure 5. 

    The electric power spectral density curve observed by three different satellites at the overhead region of NWC transmitter

    表 1 

    本文研究的人工甚低频台站列表

    Table 1. 

    VLF transmitter stations studied in this paper

    台站名称 地理经度/(°E) 地理纬度/(°N) L 频率/kHz 功率/kW
    NPM -158.15 21.42 1.17 21.4 600①②
    JJI 130.83 32.09 1.24 22.2 100
    NWC 114.17 -21.82 1.43 19.8 1000①②
    ICV 9.73 40.92 1.51 20.3 50
    FTA2 2.58 48.54 1.95 20.9 约50
    DHO38 7.61 53.08 2.39 23.4 300/500
    GQD -3.28 54.91 2.66 19.6 100/500
    NAA -67.28 44.65 2.86 24 1000①②
    NLK -121.92 48.20 2.89 24.8 250①②
    NML -98.33 46.37 3.26 25.2 250/500
    注:①引自Meredith等(2019);②引自Zhang等(2018).
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2 

    人工甚低频台站信号的辐射半径及总电场功率谱密度统计结果

    Table 2. 

    The statistical result of radiation radius and total electric field power spectral density for the VLF transmitters

    台站名称 信号辐射半径/km 总电场功率谱密度中位值/log(mV·m-1·Hz-1)
    夜侧 日侧 夜侧 日侧
    NPM 800 [-2.51, -1.31] [-4.02, -2.57]
    JJI 800 [-2.31, -1.46] [-4.45, -2.85]
    NWC 1300 300 [-2.25, -1.13] [-3.39, -2.72]
    ICV 500 [-2.39, -2.03] [-3.34, -2.65]
    FTA2 500 150 [-2.59, -2.04] [-3.44, -2.82]
    DHO38 750 200 [-2.78, -2.04] [-3.74, -2.71]
    GQD 550 150 [-2.54, -1.97] [-3.64, -2.75]
    NAA 800 300 [-2.45, -1.75] [-3.69, -2.93]
    NLK 400 150 [-2.87, -1.96] [-4.02, -3.45]
    NML 400 150 [-3.27, -2.35] [-4.00, -3.25]
    下载: 导出CSV
  •  

    Abel B, Thorne R M. 1998a. Electron scattering loss in Earth's inner magnetosphere: 1. Dominant physical processes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 103(A2): 2385-2396.

     

    Abel B, Thorne R M. 1998b. Electron scattering loss in Earth's inner magnetosphere: 2. Sensitivity to model parameters. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 103(A2): 2397-2407. doi: 10.1029/97JA02920

     

    Agapitov O V, Artemyev A V, Mourenas D, et al. 2014. Inner belt and slot region electron lifetimes and energization rates based on AKEBONO statistics of whistler waves. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 119(4): 2876-2893. doi: 10.1002/2014JA019886

     

    Andrews M K. 1978. Non-ducted whistler-mode signals at low latitudes. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 40(4): 429-436, doi: 10.1016/0021-9169(78)90174-5.

     

    Bortnik J, Inan U S, Bell T F. 2006a. Temporal signatures of radiation belt electron precipitation induced by lightning-generated MR whistler waves: 1. Methodology. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 111(A2): A02204, doi: 10.1029/2005JA011182.

     

    Bortnik J, Inan U S, Bell T F. 2006b. Temporal signatures of radiation belt electron precipitation induced by lightning-generated MR whistler waves: 2. Global signatures. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 111(A2): A02205, doi: 10.1029/2005JA011398.

     

    Claudepierre S G, Ma Q, Bortnik J, et al. 2020. Empirically estimated electron lifetimes in the Earth's radiation belts: Comparison with theory. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(3): e2019GL086056, doi: 10.1029/2019GL086056.

     

    Clilverd M A, Horne R B. 1996. Ground-based evidence of latitude-dependent cyclotron absorption of whistler mode signals originating from VLF transmitters. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 101(A2): 2355-2367, doi: 10.1029/95JA03153.

     

    Clilverd M A, Jenkins B, Thomson N R. 2000. Plasmaspheric storm time erosion. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 105(A6): 12997-13008, doi: 10.1029/1999JA900497.

     

    Clilverd M A, Rodger C J, Gamble R, et al. 2008. Ground-based transmitter signals observed from space: Ducted or nonducted?. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 113(A4): A04211, doi: 10.1029/2007JA012602.

     

    Clilverd M A, Smith A J, Thomson N R. 1992a. The effects of ionospheric horizontal electron density gradients on whistler mode signals. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 54(7-8): 1061-1074, doi: 10.1016/0021-9169(92)90072-S.

     

    Clilverd M A, Thomson N R, Smith A J. 1992b. Observation of two preferred propagation paths for whistler mode VLF signals received at a non-conjugate location. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 54(7-8): 1075-1079, doi: 10.1016/0021-9169(92)90073-T.

     

    Cohen M B, Inan U S. 2012. Terrestrial VLF transmitter injection into the magnetosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 117(A8): A08310, doi: 10.1029/2012JA017992.

     

    Gamble R J, Rodger C J, Clilverd M A, et al. 2008. Radiation belt electron precipitation by man-made VLF transmissions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 113(A10): A10211, doi: 10.1029/2008JA013369.

     

    Graf K L, Inan U S, Piddyachiy D, et al. 2009. DEMETER observations of transmitter-induced precipitation of inner radiation belt electrons. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 114(A7): A07205, doi: 10.1029/2008JA013949.

     

    Gu W Y, Chen L J, Xia Z Y, et al. 2021. Direct evidence reveals transmitter signal propagation in the magnetosphere. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(15): e2021GL093987, doi: 10.1029/2021GL093987.

     

    Gu X D, Wang Q S, Ni B B, et al. 2022. First results of the wave measurements by the WHU VLF wave detection system at the Chinese Great Wall station in Antarctica. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 127(9): e2022JA030784, doi: 10.1029/2022JA030784.

     

    Gu X D, Yi J, Wang S W, et al. 2023. Comparison of VLF signal responses to solar flares along daytime and nighttime propagation paths. Remote Sensing, 15(4): 1018, doi: 10.3390/rs15041018.

     

    Han Y, Yuan J, Feng J L, et al. 2021. Automatic detection of "horizontal" electromagnetic wave disturbance in the data of EFD on ZH-1. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 36(6): 2303-2311, doi: 10.6038/pg2021FF0157.

     

    Han Y, Yuan J, Feng J L, et al. 2022. Automatic detection of 'horizontal' electromagnetic wave disturbance in the data of EFD on ZH-1. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 37(1): 11-18, doi: 10.6038/pg2022FF0253.

     

    Helliwell R A. 1965. Whistlers and Related Ionospheric Phenomena. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

     

    Hua M, Li W, Ni B B, et al. 2020. Very-Low-Frequency transmitters bifurcate energetic electron belt in near-earth space. Nature Communications, 11: 4847, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18545-y.

     

    Hua M, Ni B B, Li W, et al. 2021. Statistical distribution of bifurcation of Earth's inner energetic electron belt at tens of keV. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(3): e2020GL091242, doi: 10.1029/2020GL091242.

     

    Huang J P, Lei J G, Li S X, et al. 2018. The Electric Field Detector (EFD) onboard the ZH-1 satellite and first observational results. Earth and Planetary Physics, 2(6): 469-478. doi: 10.26464/epp2018045

     

    Inan U S, Chang H C, Helliwell R A. 1984. Electron precipitation zones around major ground-based VLF signal sources. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 89(A5): 2891-2906. doi: 10.1029/JA089iA05p02891

     

    Kulkarni P, Inan U S, Bell T F, et al. 2008. Precipitation signatures of ground-based VLF transmitters. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 113(A7): A07214, doi: 10.1029/2007JA012569.

     

    Liu Y X Z, Xiang Z, Guo J G, et al. 2021. Scattering effect of very low frequency transmitter signals on energetic electrons in Earth's inner belt and slot region. Acta Physica Sinica (in Chinese), 70(14): 149401, doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202029.

     

    Liu Y X Z, Xiang Z, Ni B B, et al. 2022. Quasi-trapped electron fluxes induced by NWC transmitter and CRAND: Observations and simulations. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(5): e2021GL097443, doi: 10.1029/2021GL097443.

     

    Ma Q L, Mourenas D, Li W, et al. 2017. VLF waves from ground-based transmitters observed by the Van Allen Probes: Statistical model and effects on plasmaspheric electrons. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(13): 6483-6491. doi: 10.1002/2017GL073885

     

    Meredith N P, Horne R B, Clilverd M A, et al. 2019. An investigation of VLF transmitter wave power in the inner radiation belt and slot region. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 124(7): 5246-5259, doi: 10.1029/2019JA026715.

     

    Němec F, Santolík O, Hospodarsky G B, et al. 2022. Alpha transmitter signals observed by the Van Allen Probes: Ducted versus nonducted propagation. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(12): e2022GL098328, doi: 10.1029/2022GL098328.

     

    Ni B B, Hua M, Gu X D, et al. 2022. Artificial modification of Earth's radiation belts by ground-based very-low-frequency (VLF) transmitters. Science China Earth Sciences, 65(3): 391-413. doi: 10.1007/s11430-021-9850-7

     

    Parrot M, Inan U S, Lehtinen N G, et al. 2009. Penetration of lightning MF signals to the upper ionosphere over VLF ground-based transmitters. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 114(A12): A12318, doi: 10.1029/2009JA014598.

     

    Sauvaud J A, Maggiolo R, Jacquey C, et al. 2008. Radiation belt electron precipitation due to VLF transmitters: Satellite observations. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(5): L09101, doi: 10.1029/2008GL033194.

     

    Sauvaud J A, Moreau T, Maggiolo R, et al. 2006. High-energy electron detection onboard DEMETER: The IDP spectrometer, description and first results on the inner belt. Planetary and Space Science, 54(5): 502-511. doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2005.10.019

     

    Saxton J M, Smith A J. 1989. Quiet timeplasmaspheric electric fields and plasmasphere-ionosphere coupling fluxes at L=2.5. Planetary and Space Science, 37(3): 283-293, doi: 10.1016/0032-0633(89)90025-1.

     

    Selesnick R S, Albert J M, Starks M J. 2013. Influence of a ground-based VLF radio transmitter on the inner electron radiation belt. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 118(2): 628-635. doi: 10.1002/jgra.50095

     

    Shen X H, Zhang X M, Yuan S G, et al. 2018. The state-of-the-art of the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite mission. Science China Technological Sciences, 61(5): 634-642. doi: 10.1007/s11431-018-9242-0

     

    Smith R L. 1961. Propagation characteristics of whistlers trapped in field-aligned columns of enhanced ionization. Journal of Geophysical Research, 66(11): 3699-3707. doi: 10.1029/JZ066i011p03699

     

    Smith R L, Helliwell R A, Yabroff I W. 1960. A theory of trapping of whistlers in field-aligned columns of enhanced ionization. Journal of Geophysical Research, 65(3): 815-823. doi: 10.1029/JZ065i003p00815

     

    Starks M J, Quinn R A, Ginet G P, et al. 2008. Illumination of the plasmasphere by terrestrial very low frequency transmitters: Model validation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 113(A9): A09320, doi: 10.1029/2008JA013112.

     

    Storey L R O. 1953. An investigation of whistling atmospherics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 246(908): 113-141. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1953.0011

     

    Strangeways H J. 1981. Trapping of whistler-mode waves in ducts with tapered ends. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 43(10): 1071-1079. doi: 10.1016/0021-9169(81)90022-2

     

    Tao X, Bortnik J, Friedrich M. 2010. Variance of transionospheric VLF wave power absorption. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 115(A7): A07303, doi: 10.1029/2009JA015115.

     

    Thorne R M, Horne R B. 1996. Whistler absorption and electron heating near theplasmapause. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 101(A3): 4917-4928, doi: 10.1029/95JA03671.

     

    Thomson N R. 1987. Experimental observations of very low latitude man-made whistler-mode signals. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 49(4): 309-319, doi: 10.1016/0021-9169(87)90027-4.

     

    Xiang Z, Lin X H, Chen W, et al. 2021. Global morphology of NWC and NAA very-low-frequency transmitter signals in the inner magnetosphere: A survey using Van Allen Probes EMFISIS measurements. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 64(11): 3860-3869, doi: 10.6038/cjg2021P0131.

     

    Zhang Z X, Chen L J, Li X Q, et al. 2018. Observed propagation route of VLF transmitter signals in the magnetosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 123(7): 5528-5537, doi: 10.1029/2018JA025637.

     

    Zhima Z, Zhou B, Zhao S F, et al. 2022. Cross-calibration on the electromagnetic field detection payloads of the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite. Science China Technological Sciences, 65(6): 1415-1426, doi: 10.1007/s11431-021-1965-2.

     

    韩莹, 袁静, 丰继林等. 2021. "张衡一号"电场探测仪数据水平状电磁波扰动自动检测. 地球物理学进展, 36(6): 2303-2311, doi: 10.6038/pg2021FF0157.

     

    韩莹, 袁静, 丰继林等. 2022. 基于水平卷积核的"张衡一号"EFD数据水平状电磁波扰动自动检测. 地球物理学进展, 37(1): 11-18, doi: 10.6038/pg2022FF0253.

     

    刘阳希子, 项正, 郭建广等. 2021. 甚低频台站信号对地球内辐射带和槽区能量电子的散射效应分析. 物理学报, 70(14): 149401, doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202029.

     

    项正, 林显浩, 陈薇等. 2021. 基于范阿伦双星EMFISIS观测数据的NWC和NAA人工甚低频台站信号的内磁层全球统计分布. 地球物理学报, 64(11): 3860-3869, doi: 10.6038/cjg2021P0131.

  • 加载中

(5)

(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • PDF下载数: 
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-06-29
修回日期:  2023-08-30
上线日期:  2023-11-10

目录