无网格局部Petrov-Galerkin法大地电磁场二维正演模拟

卢杰, 李予国. 2017. 无网格局部Petrov-Galerkin法大地电磁场二维正演模拟. 地球物理学报, 60(3): 1189-1200, doi: 10.6038/cjg20170329
引用本文: 卢杰, 李予国. 2017. 无网格局部Petrov-Galerkin法大地电磁场二维正演模拟. 地球物理学报, 60(3): 1189-1200, doi: 10.6038/cjg20170329
LU Jie, LI Yu-Guo. 2017. Two-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling using the Meshfree Local Petrov-Galerkin method. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 60(3): 1189-1200, doi: 10.6038/cjg20170329
Citation: LU Jie, LI Yu-Guo. 2017. Two-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling using the Meshfree Local Petrov-Galerkin method. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 60(3): 1189-1200, doi: 10.6038/cjg20170329

无网格局部Petrov-Galerkin法大地电磁场二维正演模拟

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学重点基金项目(41130420)资助

详细信息
    作者简介:

    卢杰, 男, 1989年生, 博士研究生, 主要从事电磁场正演研究.E-mail:lj0830@outlook.com

    通讯作者: 李予国, 1965年生, 主要从事电磁场数值模拟和反演方法及海洋电磁法研究工作.E-mail:yuguo@ouc.edu.cn
  • 中图分类号: P631

Two-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling using the Meshfree Local Petrov-Galerkin method

More Information
  • 有限差分法和有限单元法在大地电磁场数值模拟中已经得到了广泛的应用,但其数值结果的精度在很大程度上依赖于网格的离散程度.当模拟起伏地形、弯曲界面等复杂地电模型大地电磁场响应时,常常需要花费大量的时间以便得到较合理的离散网格.无网格局部Petrov-Galerkin法(MLPG)不同于有限差分法和有限元法,其形函数和权函数脱离了网格的束缚.本文详细推导了二维大地电磁场边值问题的弱式形式,并将其离散为局部积分域内的表达形式.通过模拟二维海洋地电模型大地电磁场响应,并与结构网格有限元结果进行对比,验证了本文算法和程序的正确性及精度.设计了一个含有弯曲界面的二维地电模型,讨论了不同离散网格对MLPG无网格法模拟结果的影响,并与结构有限元法结果进行了比较,结果表明MLPG无网格法模拟结果受离散网格影响较小.最后利用MLPG无网格法计算了两个海洋起伏地形模型的大地电磁响应,讨论了海底起伏地形对大地电磁响应的影响.

  • 加载中
  • 图 1 

    二维大地电磁研究区域示意图

    Figure 1. 

    Schematic illustration of 2-D magnetotelluric modeling domain

    图 2 

    MLPG法的问题域、局部子域、权函数域、支持域示意图

    Figure 2. 

    Schematic illustration of the problem domain, integral domain, weight function domain and support domain of MLPG

    图 3 

    位于介质分界面上的节点局部积分域分解图

    Figure 3. 

    Schematic illustration of the integral domain decomposition when a node is located on an material interface

    图 4 

    二维海洋地电模型示意图

    Figure 4. 

    Sketch showing two 2D conductivity models

    图 5 

    MLPG无网格法数值解与矩形网格有限元数值解的对比

    Figure 5. 

    Comparison between the numerical solutions obtained by the MLPG and those by the FEM

    图 6 

    MLPG无网格法100m网格距时节点和高斯点的分布

    Figure 6. 

    Distribution of nodes and Gauss points in MLPG grid with spacing100 m

    图 7 

    结构化矩形网格有限元法100 m×100 m离散网格

    Figure 7. 

    100 m×100 m structured rectangle FEM grid

    图 8 

    MLPG无网格法200 m网格距时节点和高斯点的分布

    Figure 8. 

    Distribution of nodes and Gauss points in MLPG grid with spacing 200 m

    图 9 

    结构化矩形网格有限元法200 m×200 m离散网格

    Figure 9. 

    200 m×200 m structured rectangle FEM grid

    图 10 

    MLPG无网格法250 m网格距时节点和高斯点的分布

    Figure 10. 

    Distribution of nodes and Gauss points in MLPG grid with spacing 250 m

    图 11 

    结构化矩形网格有限元法250 m×250 m离散网格

    Figure 11. 

    250 m×250 m structured rectangle FEM grid

    图 12 

    MLPG无网格法和结构有限元法在1.0 Hz下3套不同离散网格模拟结果对比

    Figure 12. 

    Comparison of MT responses (1.0 Hz) obtained by the MLPG andstructured FEmethodwith three different grids

    图 13 

    MLPG无网格法和结构有限元法在0.1 Hz下3套不同离散网格模拟结果对比

    Figure 13. 

    Comparison of MT responses (0.1 Hz) obtained by MLPG and structured FE method with three different grids

    图 14 

    二维海洋梯形地堑模型

    Figure 14. 

    Sketch of a2D marine trapezoidal graben model

    图 15 

    二维海洋梯形地垒模型

    Figure 15. 

    Sketch of a2D marine trapezoidal horstmodel

    图 16 

    二维海洋梯形地堑模型节点分布

    Figure 16. 

    Node distribution of 2-D marine trapezoidal grabenmodel

    图 17 

    二维海洋梯形地垒模型节点分布

    Figure 17. 

    Node distribution of 2D marine trapezoidal horst model

    图 18 

    二维海洋梯形地堑模型在1.0 Hz和0.1 Hz下大地电磁响应

    Figure 18. 

    MT responses of 2D marine trapezoidal graben model at 1.0 Hz and 0.1 Hz

    图 19 

    二维海洋梯形地垒模型在1.0 Hz和0.1 Hz下大地电磁响应

    Figure 19. 

    MT responses of 2D marine trapezoidal horst model at 1.0 Hz and 0.1 Hz

  •  

    Atluri S N, Zhu T.1998. A new meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approach in computational mechanics.Comput. Mech., 22(2):117-127. doi: 10.1007/s004660050346

     

    Babuska I, Melenk J M.1995. The partition of unity finite element method.DTIC Document. http://www.utc.fr/~chazotje/publis/Articles/The%20Partition%20of%20Unity%20Finite%20Element%20Method%20for%20the%20simulation%20of%20waves%20in%20air%20and%20poroelastic%20media.pdf

     

    Chouteau M, Bouchard K.1988. Two-dimensional terrain correction in magnetotelluric surveys.Geophysics, 53(6):854-862. doi: 10.1190/1.1442520

     

    Coggon J H. 1971. Electromagnetic and electrical modeling by the finite element method. Geophysics, 36, 132-155. doi: 10.1190/1.1440151

     

    Dmitriev V I.1969. Electromagnetic fields in inhomogeneous media.Moscow State Univ. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286535353_Electromagnetic_Fields_in_Inhomogeneous_Media

     

    Everett M E.2012. Theoretical developments in electromagnetic induction geophysics with selected applications in the near surface.Surv.Geophys., 33(1):29-63. doi: 10.1007/s10712-011-9138-y

     

    Jones FW, Pascoe L J. 1971. A general computer program to determine the perturbation of alternating electric currents in a two-dimensional model of a region of uniform conductivity with an embedded inhomogeneity. Geophys J. Int, 24, 3-30. doi: 10.1111/gji.1971.24.issue-1

     

    Key K, Weiss C.2006. Adaptive finite-element modeling using unstructured grids:The 2D magnetotelluric example.Geophysics, 71(6):G291-G299. doi: 10.1190/1.2348091

     

    Li J M. 2005. Geoelectric Field and Electrical Exploration (in Chinese).Beijing:China University of Geosciences.

     

    Li Y G, Dai S K. 2011. Finite element modelling of marine controlled-source electromagnetic responses in two-dimensional dipping anisotropic conductivity structures.Geophys. J. Int., 185(2):622-636. doi: 10.1111/gji.2011.185.issue-2

     

    Li Y G, Key K.2007. 2D marine controlled-source electromagnetic modeling:Part 1-An adaptive finite-element algorithm.Geophysics, 72(2):WA51-WA62. doi: 10.1190/1.2432262

     

    Li Y G, Pek J.2008. Adaptive finite element modelling of two-dimensional magnetotelluric fields in general anisotropic media.Geophys. J. Int., 175(3):942-954. doi: 10.1111/gji.2008.175.issue-3

     

    Liu G R, Gu Y T.2005. An Introduction to Meshfree Methods and Their Programming.Netherlands:Springer. http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/1-4020-3468-7

     

    Liu X.2011.Meshfree Method (in Chinese). Beijing:Science Press.

     

    Lucy L B.1977. A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis.The Astronomical Journal, 82:1013-1024. doi: 10.1086/112164

     

    Mackie R L, Madden T R, Wannamaker P E.1993. Three-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling using difference equations-Theory and comparisons to integral equation solutions.Geophysics, 58(2):215-226. doi: 10.1190/1.1443407

     

    Nayroles B, Touzot G, Villon P.1992. Generalizing the finite element method:diffuse approximation and diffuse elements.Comput. Mech., 10(5):307-318. doi: 10.1007/BF00364252

     

    Oñate E, Idelsohn S, Zienkiewicz O C, et al.1996. A finite point method in computational mechanics. Applications to convective transport and fluid flow.Int. J.Numer. Meth. Eng., 39(22):3839-3866. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0207

     

    Schwalenberg K, Edwards R N.2004. The effect of seafloor topography on magnetotelluric fields:an analytical formulation confirmed with numerical results.Geophys. J. Int., 159(2):607-621. doi: 10.1111/gji.2004.159.issue-2

     

    Wannamaker P E, Stodt J A, Rijo L.1986. Two-dimensional topographic responses in magnetotellurics modeled using finite elements.Geophysics, 51(11):2131-2144. doi: 10.1190/1.1442065

     

    Weidelt P.1975. Electromagnetic induction in three-dimensional structures.J. Geophys, 41:85-109. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272658479_Electromagnetic_Induction_in_Three_Dimensional_Structures_for_Various_Source_Fields

     

    Wei W B.2002. New advance and prospect of Magnetotelluricsounding (MT) in China.Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 17(2):245-254.

     

    Wittke J, Tezkan B.2014. Meshfreemagnetotelluric modelling. Geophys. J. Int., 198(2):1255-1268. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggu207

     

    Xu S Z, Zhao S K.1987. Two-dimensional magnetotelluric modelling by the boundary element method.Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, 39(11):677-698. doi: 10.5636/jgg.39.677

     

    Xu S Z.1994. Finite Element Methods in Geophysics (in Chinese). Beijing:Science Press.

     

    Xu S Z.1995. Boundary Element Methods in Geophysics (in Chinese). Beijing:Science Press.

     

    Zhao H, Liu Y, Li Y G.2014.Adaptive finite element forward modeling for two-dimensional marine magnetotelluric fields.Oil Geophysical Prospecting (in Chinese), 49(3):578-585. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285957176_Adaptive_finite_element_forward_modeling_for_two-dimensional_marine_magnetotelluric_fields

     

    李金铭.2005.地电场与电法勘探.北京:地质出版社.

     

    刘欣.2011.无网格方法.北京:科学出版社.

     

    魏文博.2002.我国大地电磁测深新进展及瞻望.地球物理学进展, 17(2):245-254. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ200202008.htm

     

    徐世浙.1994.地球物理中的有限单元法.北京:科学出版社.

     

    徐世浙.1995.地球物理中的边界单元法.北京:科学出版社.

     

    赵慧, 刘颖, 李予国.2014.自适应有限元海洋大地电磁场二维正演模拟.石油地球物理勘探, 49(3):578-585. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDQ201403032.htm

  • 加载中

(19)

计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • PDF下载数: 
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2016-01-05
修回日期:  2016-11-18
上线日期:  2017-03-01

目录