四川长宁<em>M</em><sub>S</sub>6.0地震震区上地壳速度结构特征与孕震环境

doi:10.6038/cjg2021O0241

摘要
图/表
参考文献(0)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (10445 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

北京时间2019年6月17日22时55分，四川省宜宾市长宁县发生了M_S6.0地震（28.34°N，104.90°E），四川盆地内部及边缘地带的深部孕震环境和潜在地震危险性再次引起了国内外地震专家和学者们的密切关注.为了揭示长宁M_S6.0震区的深部介质结构特征和孕震环境，综合解译地震活动的构造背景和展布特征，本文充分收集川东南宜宾长宁地震震区及其周边范围内由四川省数字测震台网、宜宾市地方测震台网以及2016年以后宜宾长宁地区新增小孔径流动地震台阵等共计35套观测地震设备2013年1月—2019年7月记录到的17305次地震的P波到时资料的数据，应用双差地震层析成像方法，反演得到了长宁震区及周边上地壳三维P波速度结构特征，并结合此次震后科考组在震区获取的三维大地电磁阵列测深和重力密集测量等最新观测资料，综合分析讨论了长宁震区速度结构特征与地震活动关系、孕震环境及其地震危险性等科学问题.研究结果表明：长宁震区及周边上地壳P波速度结构呈现出明显的横向不均匀性，震区沉积盖层的物性特征分异明显，双河场背斜褶皱北西侧的波速结构与其东部存在明显的差异性且浅层P波速度结构分布特征与地表地质构造和地层岩性密切相关.重新定位后的长宁M_S6.0地震序列空间分布特征与震区上地壳介质速度结构存在密切关系，序列大体上沿着高低速异常分界线呈NW-SE向展布，并终止于白象岩—狮子滩背斜构造东段附近，长宁震区及周边介质速度结构的非均匀变化是控制主震及其序列空间展布的深部构造因素.三维P波速度结构还表明了长宁M_S6.0震区双河场褶皱附近存在不一样的深浅构造背景，震区褶皱构造伴生断裂的复杂性可能破坏了盖层地层成层性，造成了介质物性界面的变化多样，从而导致深浅构造耦合存在明显的差异.长宁M_S6.0地震震中位于速度结构发生变化的边界带附近，这种介质物性变化的边界带可能是中强地震孕育和发生的有利部位.长宁M_S6.0地震及其序列绝大部分发生在基底滑脱带之上，由于受到区域NE-SW向主压应力和经华蓥山构造带传递而来的NW-SE向的现今应力场的共同作用，导致了此次长宁6.0级地震的发生，而随后发生的珙县M_S5.1、长宁M_S5.3、珙县M_S5.4和M_S5.6地震以及大量中小地震事件均为长宁6.0级地震触发作用所致.P波速度结构还揭示了震区双河场褶皱以及该褶皱构造地表出露伴生的大地湾断层和NW向大佛崖断层两侧浅层速度结构特征各异，结合长宁—双河背斜与轴线方向一致的NW向伴生断裂构造比较发育，而褶皱东侧的伴生断裂走向表现出多样性和复杂性，由此推断除了受区域性构造运动的影响之外，长宁震区局部构造的差异性活动也较为突出，长宁—双河背斜构造区轴部构造及其伴生的断裂具备一定的发震能力和深部孕震背景，这可能也是长宁地震余震强度较大、活动持续时间较长的主要原因，川东南地区地震活动趋势和潜在地震危险性仍值得进一步关注.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李大虎
	詹艳
	丁志峰
	高家乙
	吴萍萍
	孟令媛
	孙翔宇
	张旭

关键词 ：长宁M_S6.0地震, 地壳速度结构, 地震活动, 深部构造, 孕震环境

Abstract：

22:55 on June 17, 2019, a magnitude 6.0 earthquake (28.34°N, 104.90°E) occurred in Changning County, Yibin City, Sichuan Province, China. The deep seismogenic environment and potential earthquake risk in the inner and marginal areas of Sichuan Basin have once again attracted the close attention of seismologists and scholars at home and abroad. In order to reveal the characteristics of the deep medium structure and the seismogenic environment of the Changning M_S6.0 earthquake area, and to interpret the tectonic background and genesis of the earthquake activities comprehensively, In this paper, we fully collected a total of 35 sets of observation seismic equipment which deployed in the Changning earthquake area in Southeast Sichuan and its surrounding areas, including Sichuan digital seismological network, Yibin local seismological network and new mobile seismological stations in Yibin after 2016, P-wave arrival data of 17305 earthquakes recorded from January 2013 to July 2019. Double-difference seismic tomography method was used to invert the three-dimensional P-wave velocity structure characteristics of the upper crust around the Changning earthquake area, combined with the three-dimensional magnetotelluric array sounding and gravity intensive measurements obtained in the earthquake region by the post-earthquake scientific research, we comprehensively analyzed and discussed the scientific issues such as the relationship between the velocity structure characteristics and seismic activity in the Changning earthquake area, the deep tectonic environment and the seismic risk. The results show that the P-wave velocity structure of the upper crust around the Changning earthquake zone shows obvious lateral inhomogeneity, the physical properties of the sedimentary layer in the earthquake zone are obviously different, and there is a high-velocity anomaly distribution in the sedimentary layer where the Changning anticline is located, There is a clear difference between the velocity structure of the periphery around Shuanghe anticline and its east. The spatial distribution characteristics of the relocated Changning M_S6.0 earthquake sequence are closely related to the velocity structure of the upper crust. The sequence generally spread in the NW-SE direction along the boundary of high-low velocity anomaly, and terminate near the east section of the Baixiangyan-Shizitan anticline, The inhomogeneous variation of the velocity structure of the Changning earthquake area and its surrounding medium is the deep structural factor controlling the spatial distribution of the mainshock and its sequence. The three-dimensional P-wave velocity structure also shows that there are different deep-shallow structural backgrounds near the Shuanghe folds in Changning M_S6.0 earthquake. The different activities of local structures in the earthquake region not only cause the variety of fold structure axial and associated fault strike, but also cause the obvious differences between coupling relationship of deep and shallow structures and physical characteristics of sedimentary cover in the earthquake area. The epicenter of the Changning M_S6.0 earthquake was located near the boundary zone where the velocity structure changes. This boundary zone of physical property change may be a favorable location for earthquake preparation and occurrence of moderate-strong earthquakes. The Changning M_S6.0 earthquake and most of its sequence occurred above the basement detachment zone, due to the joint action of the regional NE-SW principal compressive stress and the NW-SE present stress field transmitted through the Huayingshan structural belt, the following earthquakes with magnitude 5.1 in Gongxian, magnitude 5.3 in Changning, magnitude 5.4 and magnitude 5.6 in Gongxian, as well as a large number of small and medium-sized earthquake events, were triggered by the Changning M_S6.0 earthquake. The P-wave velocity structure also reveals that there are different shallow velocity structures on both sides of Shuanghe fold, Dadiwan fault and Dafuya fault in NW direction. Combined with the ground geological survey results, such as the relatively developed NW fault structure associated with the axis of Changning-Shuanghe anticline, and the strike of associated faults of the east fold structure also shows diversity and complexity. The results show that in addition to the influence of regional tectonic movement, the differential activities of local structures in the Changning earthquake area are also prominent. The axial structures and associated faults in the Changning-Shuanghe anticline structural area have certain earthquake generating capacity and deep seismogenic background, this may also be the main reason for the large aftershock intensity and long duration of Changning earthquake. The seismicity trend and potential seismic risk in southeast Sichuan still deserve further attention.

Key words： Changning M_S6.0 earthquake Crustal velocity structure Seismicity Deep tectonic Seismogenic environment

收稿日期: 2020-06-29

PACS:

P315

基金资助:

国家自然科学基金（41974066，41704052），中国地震局地震科技星火计划项目（XH20051，XH192305），川滇国家地震监测预报实验场项目（2016CESE010），中国地震局四川长宁6.0级地震科学考察项目和四川省地震局地震科技创新团队项目（201804）共同资助.

通讯作者: 詹艳,1969年生,博士,研究员,主要从事大地电磁测深、深部孕震环境研究等工作.E-mail:zhanyan66@vip.sina.com E-mail: zhanyan66@vip.sina.com

作者简介: 李大虎,1982年生,博士,副研究员,目前主要从事地震学和深部构造研究等工作.E-mail:lixiang2006@sina.com

链接本文:

http://www.geophy.cn//CN/10.6038/cjg2021O0241 或 http://www.geophy.cn//CN/Y2021/V64/I1/18

Allam A A, Ben-Zion Y, Kurzon I, et al. 2014. Seismic velocity structure in the hot springs and trifurcation areas of the San Jacinto fault zone, California, from double-difference tomography. Geophysical Journal International, 198(2):978-999, doi:10.1093/gji/ggu176.
Chang L J, Wang C Y, Ding Z F. 2008. Seismic anisotropy of upper mantle in Sichuan and adjacent regions. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 51(12):1683-1693, doi:10.1007/s11430-008-0147-8.
Chang L J, Ding Z F, Wang C Y. 2015. Upper mantle anisotropy beneath the southern segment of North-South tectonic belt, China. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 58(11):4052-4067, doi:10.6038/cjg20151114.
Chang Z F, Wang G M. 2019. The tectonic setting of the M6.0 Changning earthquake on June 17, 2019. Recent Developments in World Seismology (in Chinese), (8):179-181.
Eberhart-Phillips D. 1986. Three-dimensional velocity structure in northern California Coast Ranges from inversion of local earthquake arrival times. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 76(4):1025-1052.
Eberhart-Phillips D, Iyer H M, Hirahara K. 1993. Local earthquake tomography:earthquake source regions.//Seismic Tomography:Theory and Practice. London:Chapman and Hall, 613-643.
Gan W J, Zhang P Z, Shen Z K, et al. 2007. Present-day crustal motion within the Tibetan Plateau inferred from GPS measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 112(B8):B08416, doi:10.1029/2005JB004120.
Gao J W. 2012. Geometrics and Kinematics of structures in southwest Sichuan basin:Indications to the geo-dynamic settings of the southeast margin of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[Master's thesis] (in Chinese). Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing).
Gao Y, Shi Y T, Chen A G. 2018. Crustal seismic anisotropy and compressive stress in the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau and the influence of the M_S8.0 Wenchuan earthquake. Chinese Science Bulletin (in Chinese), 63(19):1934-1948, doi:10.1360/N972018-00317.
Gong Y, Long F, Qiao H Z, et al. 2015. Spatial and temporal distribution of seismic apparent stress in the southeast of Sichuan Province. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research (in Chinese), 36(2):6-12.
Guo Z W, Deng K L, Han Y H, et al. 1996. The Formation and Development of Sichuan Basin (in Chinese). Beijing:Geological Publishing House.
Hansen P C. 1992. Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve. SIAM Review, 34(4):561-580, doi:10.1137/1034115.
Hansen P C, O'Leary D P. 1993. The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 14(6):1487-1503, doi:10.1137/0914086.
He D F, Lu R Q, Huang H Y, et al. 2019. Tectonic and geological background of the earthquake hazards in Changning shale gas development zone, Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development (in Chinese), 46(5):993-1006, doi:10.11698/PED.2019.05.19.
Hofstetter R, Dorbath C, Calò M. 2012. Crustal structure of the Dead Sea Basin from local earthquake tomography. Geophysical Journal International, 189(1):554-568, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05369.x.
Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration. 2020. Scientific investigation report of Changning M_S6.0 earthquake (in Chinese). http://124.17.4.85/?p=4065. 2020-07-23.
Jia K, Zhou S Y, Zhuang J C, et al. Nonstationary background seismicity rate and evolution of stress changes in the Changning salt mining and shale-gas hydraulic fracturing region, Sichuan Basin, China. Seismological Research Letters, 91(4):2170-2181, doi:10.1785/0220200092.
Kato A, Miyatake T, Hirata N. 2010. Asperity and barriers of the 2004 Mid-Niigata Prefecture earthquake revealed by highly dense seismic observations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100(1):298-306, doi:10.1785/0120090218.
Lei X L, Huang D J, Su J R, et al. 2017. Fault reactivation and earthquakes with magnitudes of up to M_W4.7 induced by shale-gas hydraulic fracturing in Sichuan Basin, China. Scientific Reports, 7:7971, doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08557-y.
Lei X L, Wang Z W, Su J R. 2019a. The December 2018 M_L5.7 and January 2019 M_L5.3 earthquakes in South Sichuan Basin induced by shale gas hydraulic fracturing. Seismological Research Letters, 90(3):1099-1110.
Lei X L, Wang Z W, Su J R. 2019b. Possible link between long-term and short-term water injections and earthquakes in salt mine and shale gas site in Changning, south Sichuan Basin, China. Earth and Planetary Physics, 3(6):510-525, doi:10.26464/epp2019052.
Li D H, Ding Z F, Wu P P, et al. 2015a. The deep seismogenic environment of the southeastern section of the Xianshuihe fault zone and the 2014 Kangding M_S6.3 earthquake. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 58(6):1941-1953, doi:10.6038/cjg20150610.
Li D H, Wu P P, Ding Z F. 2015b. Tomography of the three dimensional P-wave velocity structure in the source region of the M_S7.0 Lushan, Sichuan, earthquake and its surrounding areas. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 37(3):371-385, doi:10.11939/jass.2015.03.001.
Li D H, Ding Z F, Wu P P, et al. 2019. Deep structure of the Zhaotong and Lianfeng fault zones in the eastern segment of the Sichuan-Yunnan border and the 2014 Ludian M_S6.5 earthquake. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 62(12):4571-4587, doi:10.6038/cjg2019M0450.
Li J L, Xu J, Tan Y Y, et al. 2019. Shallow seismic research and velocity structure imaging in Zhaotong shale gas development area, Changning, Sichuan Province, based on dense array.//Proceedings of Geophysical Exploration Technology Symposium, China Petroleum Institute (in Chinese). Chengdu:China Academic Journal (CD Edition) e-magazine Co., Ltd.
Long F, Zhang Z W, Qi Y P, et al. 2020. Three dimensional velocity structure and accurate earthquake location in Changning-Gongxian area of southeast Sichuan. Earth and Planetary Physics, 4(2):163-177, doi:10.26464/epp2020022.
Ma X, Westman E C, Fahrman B P, et al. 2016. Imaging of temporal stress redistribution due to triggered seismicity at a deep nickel mine. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, 5:55-64, doi:10.1016/j.gete.2016.01.001.
Meng L Y, McGarr A, Zhou L Q, et al. 2019. An investigation of seismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing in the Sichuan Basin of China based on data from a temporary seismic network. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 109(1):348-357, doi:10.1785/0120180310.
Nalbant S S, McCloskey J. 2011. Stress evolution before and after the 2008 Wenchuan, China earthquake. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 307(1-2):222-232
Okada T, Yaginuma T, Umino N, et al. 2006. Detailed imaging of the fault planes of the 2004 Niigata-Chuetsu, central Japan, earthquake sequence by double-difference tomography. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 244(1-2):32-43, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2006.02.010.
Okada T, Hasegawa A, Suganomata J, et al. 2007. Imaging the heterogeneous source area of the 2003 M6.4 northern Miyagi earthquake, NE Japan, by double-difference tomography. Tectonophysics, 430(1-4):67-81, doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2006.11.001.
Parsons T, Ji C, Kirby E. 2008. Stress changes from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and increased hazard in the Sichuan basin. Nature, 454(7023):509-510.
Qian H, Tang R C. 1992. Seismo-geological features of the Sichuan basin. Earthquake Research in Sichuan (in Chinese), (3):13-18.
Sichuan Earthquake Administration. 2019. Hazard degree map of the 17 June 2019 M6.0 Changning earthquake. https://www.cea.gov.cn/cea/xwzx/fzjzyw/5477826/index.html. 2019-06-20.
Song H B, Luo Z L. 1995. The study of the basement and deep geological structures of Sichuan basin, China. Earth Science Frontiers (in Chinese), 2(3-4):231-237.
Sun X Y, Zhan Y, Zhao L Q. 2017. Magnetotelluric 3D exploration of deep dielectric resistivity structure in Changning seismic window, Sichuan Province.//2017 China Geoscience Union Annual Conference (16) (in Chinese). Beijing:China Peace Audio Visual Electronic Publishing House.
Spakman W, Van Der Lee S, Van Der Hilst R. 1993. Travel-time tomography of the European-Mediterranean mantle down to 1400 km. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 79(1-2):3-74, doi:10.1016/0031-9201(93)90142-V.
Thurber C, Roecker S, Zhang H J, et al. 2004. Fine-scale structure of the San Andreas fault zone and location of the SAFOD target earthquakes. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(12):L12S02, doi:10.1029/2003GL0193.
Thurber C, Brocher T M, Zhang H J, et al. 2007. Three-dimensional P wave velocity model for the San Francisco Bay region, California. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 112(B7):B07313, doi:10.1029/2006JB004682.
Toda S, Lin J, Meghraoui M, et al. 2008. 12 May 2008 M=7.9 Wenchuan, China, earthquake calculated to increase failure stress and seismicity rate on three major fault systems. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(17):L17305, doi:10.1029/2008GL034903.
Tong C G. 1992. Tectonic Evolution and Oil-Gas Accumulation in Sichuan Basin (in Chinese). Beijing:Geological Publishing House.
Waldhauser F, Ellsworth W L. 2000. A double-difference earthquake location algorithm:method and application to the northern Hayward fault, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(6):1353-1368, doi:10.1785/0120000006.
Wang C Z, Wu J P, Yang T, et al. 2018. Crustal structure beneath the Taiyuan Basin and adjacent areas revealed by double-difference tomography. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 61(3):963-974, doi:10.6038/cjg2018L0114.
Wang S Z. 2014. The tectonic characteristics of Changning area, south of Sichuan and crack characteristics of Longmaxi formation of Silurian system[Master's thesis] (in Chinese). Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology.
Wang Y M, Huang J L, Wang S F, et al. 2016. Dissection of two calibrated areas of the Silurian Longmaxi Formation, Changning and Jiaoshiba, Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience (in Chinese), 27(3):423-432.
Watkins W D, Thurber C H, Abbott E R, et al. 2018. Local earthquake tomography of the Jalisco, Mexico region. Tectonophysics, 724-725:51-64.
Wu H B, Shen X L, Wang J, et al. 2018. Three-dimensional velocity structure of upper crust in the Three Gorges Reservoir area derived from double-difference tomography. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 61(7):2802-2814, doi:10.6038/cjg2018L0345.
Xiao Z, Gao Y. 2017. Crustal velocity structure beneath the northeastern Tibetan plateau and adjacent regions derived from double difference tomography. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 60(6):2213-2225, doi:10.6038/cjg20170615.
Xu T, Zhang M H, Tian X B, et al. 2014. Upper crustal velocity of Lijiang-Qingzhen profile and its relationship with the seismogenic environment of the M_S6.5 Ludian earthquake. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 57(9):3069-3079, doi:10.6038/cjg20140932.
Yi G X, Wen X Z, Zhang Z W, et al. 2010. Study on potential strong earthquake risk in Mabian area, southern Sichuan. Seismology and Geology (in Chinese), 32(2):282-293.
Yi G X, Long F, Zhang Z W, et al. 2013. The relationship between earthquakes in Changning window and M ≥ 5.5 earthquakes in Sichuan and its adjacent area. Journal of Seismological Research (in Chinese), 36(4):427-432.
Yi G X, Long F, Wen X Z, et al. 2015. Seismogenic structure of the M6.3 Kangding earthquake sequence on 22 Nov. 2014, Southwestern China. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 58(4):1205-1219, doi:10.6038/cjg20150410.
Yi G X, Long F, Zhao M, et al. 2016. Focal mechanism and seismogenic structure of the M5.0 Yuexi earthquake on 1 Oct. 2014, Southwestern China. Seismology and Geology (in Chinese), 38(4):1124-1136, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.04.025.
Yi G X, Long F, Liang M J, et al. 2017. Focal mechanism solutions and seismogenic structure of the 8 August 2017 M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake and its aftershocks, northern Sichuan. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 60(10):4083-4097, doi:10.6038/cjg20171033.
Yi G X, Long F, Liang M J, et al. 2019. Focal mechanism solutions and seismogenic structure of the 17 June 2019 M_S6.0 Sichuan Changning earthquake sequence. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 62(9):3432-3447, doi:10.6038/cjg2019N0297.
Yi G X, Long F, Liang M J, et al. 2020. Geometry and tectonic deformation of seismogenic structures in the Rongxian-Weiyuan-Zizhong region, Sichuan Basin:insights from focal mechanism solutions. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 63(9):3275-3291, doi:10.6038/cjg2020O0095.
Zhang H J, Thurber C H. 2003. Double-difference tomography:the method and its application to the Hayward fault, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(5):1875-1889, doi:10.1785/0120020190.
Zhang H J, Thurber C. 2006. Development and applications of double-difference seismic tomography. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 163(2-3):373-403, doi:10.1007/s00024-005-0021-y.
Zhang Y Q, Dong S W, Li J H, et al. 2011. Mesozoic multi-directional compressional tectonics and formation-reformation of Sichuan basin. Geology in China (in Chinese), 38(2):233-250.
Zhao C J, Yang R C, Tian X Y. 1989. Relationship between the tectonic stress field and oil-gas enrichment in East Sichuan structures. Acta Petrolei Sinica (in Chinese), 10(2):19-30.
附中文参考文献
常利军, 王椿镛, 丁志峰. 2008. 四川及邻区上地幔各向异性研究. 中国科学 D辑:地球科学, 38(12):1589-1599.
常利军, 丁志峰, 王椿镛. 2015. 南北构造带南段上地幔各向异性特征. 地球物理学报, 58(11):4052-4067, doi:10.6038/cjg20151114.
常祖峰, 王光明. 2019. 2019年6月17日长宁M6.0地震的构造背景. 国际地震动态, (8):179-181.
高金尉. 2012. 四川盆地西南地区构造几何学与运动学特征及其对青藏高原东南缘动力学背景的指示[硕士论文]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京).
高原, 石玉涛, 陈安国. 2018. 青藏高原东缘地震各向异性、应力及汶川地震影响. 科学通报, 63(19):1934-1948, doi:10.1360/N972018-00317.
宫悦, 龙锋, 乔慧珍等. 2015. 川东南地区地震视应力时空分布特征. 地震地磁观测与研究, 36(2):6-12.
郭正吾, 邓康龄, 韩永辉等. 1996. 四川盆地形成与演化. 北京:地质出版社.
何登发, 鲁人齐, 黄涵宇等. 2019. 长宁页岩气开发区地震的构造地质背景. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(5):993-1006, doi:10.11698/PED.2019.05.19.
李大虎, 丁志峰, 吴萍萍等. 2015a. 鲜水河断裂带南东段的深部孕震环境与2014年康定M_S6.3地震. 地球物理学报, 58(6):1941-1953, doi:10.6038/cjg20150610.
李大虎, 吴萍萍, 丁志峰. 2015b. 四川芦山M_S7.0地震震源区及其周边区域P波三维速度结构研究. 地震学报, 37(3):371-385, doi:10.11939/jass.2015.03.001.
李大虎, 丁志峰, 吴萍萍等. 2019. 川滇交界东段昭通、莲峰断裂带的深部结构特征与2014年鲁甸M_S6.5地震. 地球物理学报, 62(12):4571-4587, doi:10.6038/cjg2019M0450.
李俊伦, 徐建, 谭玉阳等. 2019. 基于密集台阵的四川长宁昭通页岩气开发区域浅部地震研究及速度结构成像.//中国石油学会2019年物探技术研讨会论文集. 成都:《中国学术期刊(光盘版)》电子杂志社有限公司.
钱洪, 唐荣昌. 1992. 四川盆地的地震地质特征. 四川地震, (3):13-18.
四川省地质局. 1976. 区域地质调查报告(叙永幅:1:200000). 河北:国营五四三厂.
四川省地震局. 2019.四川长宁6.0级地震烈度图发布. https://www.cea.gov.cn/cea/xwzx/fzjzyw/5477826/index.html. 2019-06-20.
四川省地质局第一区测队六分队. 1973. 区域地质测量报告(筠连幅:1:200000). 河北:国营五四三厂.
宋鸿彪, 罗志立. 1995. 四川盆地基底及深部地质结构研究的进展. 地学前缘, 2(3-4):231-237.
孙翔宇, 詹艳, 赵凌强. 2017. 四川长宁地震窗深部介质电阻率结构大地电磁三维探测研究.//2017中国地球科学联合学术年会论文集(十六). 北京:中国和平音像电子出版社.
童崇光. 1992. 四川盆地构造演化与油气聚集. 北京:地质出版社.
王长在, 吴建平, 杨婷等. 2018. 太原盆地及周边地区双差层析成像. 地球物理学报,61(3):963-974, doi:10.6038/cjg2018L0114.
王适择. 2014. 川南长宁地区构造特征及志留系龙马溪组裂缝特征研究[硕士论文]. 成都:成都理工大学.
王玉满, 黄金亮, 王淑芳等. 2016. 四川盆地长宁、焦石坝志留系龙马溪组页岩气刻度区精细解剖. 天然气地球科学, 27(3):423-432.
吴海波, 申学林, 王杰等. 2018. 三峡库区上地壳三维速度结构的双差层析成像研究. 地球物理学报, 61(7):2802-2814, doi:10.6038/cjg2018L0345.
肖卓, 高原. 2017. 利用双差成像方法反演青藏高原东北缘及其邻区地壳速度结构. 地球物理学报, 60(6):2213-2225, doi:10.6038/cjg20170615.
徐涛, 张明辉, 田小波等. 2014. 丽江-清镇剖面上地壳速度结构及其与鲁甸M_S6.5级地震孕震环境的关系. 地球物理学报, 57(9):3069-3079, doi:10.6038/cjg20140932.
宜宾市防震减灾局. 2014. 长宁双河区域地震多发区地震构造及成因分析研究(内部报告).
易桂喜, 闻学泽, 张致伟等. 2010. 川南马边地区强震危险性分析. 地震地质, 32(2):282-293.
易桂喜, 龙锋, 张致伟等. 2013. 长宁窗地震与四川及邻区M ≥ 5.5地震的对应关系. 地震研究, 36(4):427-432.
易桂喜, 龙锋, 闻学泽等. 2015. 2014年11月22日康定M6.3级地震序列发震构造分析. 地球物理学报, 58(4):1205-1219, doi:10.6038/cjg20150410.
易桂喜, 龙锋, 赵敏等. 2016. 2014年10月1日越西M5.0地震震源机制与发震构造分析. 地震地质, 38(4):1124-1136, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.04.025
易桂喜, 龙锋, 梁明剑等. 2017. 2017年8月8日九寨沟M7.0地震及余震震源机制解与发震构造分析. 地球物理学报, 60(10):4083-4097, doi:10.6038/cjg20171033.
易桂喜, 龙锋, 梁明剑等. 2019. 2019年6月17日四川长宁M_S6.0地震序列震源机制解与发震构造分析. 地球物理学报, 62(9):3432-3447, doi:10.6038/cjg2019N0297.
易桂喜, 龙锋, 梁明剑等. 2020. 四川盆地荣县-威远-资中地区发震构造几何结构与构造变形特征:基于震源机制解的认识和启示. 地球物理学报, 63(9):3275-3291, doi:10.6038/cjg2020O0095.
张岳桥, 董树文, 李建华等. 2011. 中生代多向挤压构造作用与四川盆地的形成和改造. 中国地质, 38(2):233-250.
赵从俊, 杨日畅, 田晓燕. 1989. 川东构造应力场与油气富集规律探讨. 石油学报, 10(2):19-30.
中国地震局地球物理研究所. 2020.四川长宁6.0级地震科学考察报告. http://124.17.4.85/?p=4065. 2020-07-23.